Crimes in the Mainstream

I have been pondering some mind bending possibilities about the mainstream news media (MSNM) in the last few days.  More so, in light of the revelations that they all found some level of morality in respect to the 911 recordings of Sandy Hook Elementary School Massacre. 

The very mention of morality in the MSNM in the same sentence is laughable at best.  These are the same compromised news outlets that allow the government to promote any sort of propaganda it seems fit to, and do not ask any questions that the people would like answered.  Go ahead Mr. President, just lie to us, and we will spew forth that lie.

These MSNM show Paul Walker's death over and over, the car blowing up, with him and the driver inside, as another story.  What about his family? 

These are the same MSNM networks that will show airplanes flying into skyscrapers.  What do think happened to all those "innocent victims" when the planes hit?  Did they not exist?  What about their families?  

These are the same MSNM outlets that showed the inside of Columbine High School when that massacre happened.

These MSNM networks show deaths by the thousands in the "Shock and Awe" spectacle when Baghdad was being blown to bits.  Do you not think that all those innocent men, women, and children deserved some respect? Oh, no, I forget, they have brown skin, and their country sits on oil. 

I could go on an on about the sheer hypocrisy these MSNM put out over the airwaves everyday, but I think you get the point.

These (sorry kids) fucking assholes in the role of producers for MSNM are the scum of the earth.  The only reason they portend to not play the Sandy Hook AUDIO recording is for ratings.  They are trying to hype what is on the recordings.  I have listened to them.  I have one overriding question after hearing them.

I sent an email to Channel WFSB 3, asking about the DNA problems in THE STATES OWN REPORT,  The reply was from a nameless individual at WFSB , "how dare you question anything about Sandy Hook.  20 Children died, I cant believe I have to answer email"  When I asked if the nameless sender had read the report, I got no reply.

  Who the hell is Rick Thorne?  Why is this the first time we have heard his name, instead of that creepy Simon Bar Sinister dude, Gene Rosen.  I am dating myself with the Underdog reference, but look up Simon, you will know what I mean.

Where has Rick Thorne been hiding for a year?  Does he even exist?  How come all the recordings have this air of "calm" about them?

It is not so much about what we see on the MSNM, its what we do not see, and worst of all, what the MSNM does not demand that we see?  

• How about the "alleged" LAX shooter's manifesto/note from his backpack?
• How about the video from LAX of the shooting itself?  Correct me if I am wrong here, but don't airports have a boatload of cctv's?
• How about the supposed video of the Boston Marathon bombers dropping their backpacks in the garbage bins?
• How about the truth about Christoper Dorner?  What a crock of shit they made up when he died?  Lets see, they found his wallet twice, in two locations, he killed himself, the tear gas containers started a fire, yet the weapons found were in pristine condition.
• How about the fact that no serial numbered piece of any airplane was ever recovered from the Pentagon on 9/11?  We were told that 100 tons of metal, luggage, seats, and titanium engines weighing 6 tons a piece "evaporated", yet, somehow, the DNA of every passenger was identified.  Who makes this shit up?
• How about the death of Phil Marshall?  Look that up.  This stinks to high heaven.
• How did the DNA from a victim in the Sandy Hook School get inside the home of Adam Lanza?
• How did the DNA of a Sandy Hook victim get on the gun that was found in his car?  This gun NEVER went in the school?
• How about the supposed killing of OBL?  How come a small cadre of reporters on the level of say, John Pilger were not allowed to witness the body, before it was supposedly dumped in the ocean? 
• How about the fact that the "war on drugs" is a scam? How can the U.S. military be in Afghanistan for 12 years, and in 2013 they broke their record for opium exports to $970 BILLION DOLLARS? How is that even remotely possible?  (well, the CIA does help)
• How about Clapper lying to Congress?  How about Alexander lying about the NSA spying? How about Hayden lying about stealing our data?
• How about a 47 story skyscraper that falls into its own footprint? On any other day this would be the story of the year, but on 9/11 it is ignored.  When citizens start to question it, we are mocked as "conspiracy theorists".  How many other steel frame skyscrapers have collapsed before or after 9/11?  NONE. 
• How about the fact that our Attorney General cannot answer simple questions about "Fast and Furious" gun running operations, conducted by U.S. government? 
• These people should be in jail for crimes against the Constitution.
• How about Holder not being able to answer questions about the NSA blackmailing members of congress, and illegally spying on activist groups?
• Have you looked up at the skies lately?  The vast amount of Chemtrails is astounding.  The MSNM is so silent on this topic, it is criminal.  I took the photo below last week.  The sky was crystal clear only one hour prior to this.  If you zoom in, you can see the planes spraying chemicals. It is a panoramic photo, hence, the straight chemtrails look curved. Sorry, it was the only way to capture the magnitude of the spraying and sky.

If you doubt the evidence of chemtrails, I defy you to watch this documentary. 

What in the world are they spraying"

These are just a few examples off the top of my head, in a few minutes.  These are the topics that the MSNM either ignore, or just spew the government talking points to us, the American people.  It is disgusting, and quite frankly, we should not stand for it. 

These are but a few of the questions that the MSNM has never asked the powers that be, to explain.  It is a crime, pure and simple.  And for anyone in that industry to go on the air and talk about their high morality is criminal.

Gitmo Gil

How Come?

How come we cannot see the video of something hitting the Pentagon on 9/11?  There are 85 tapes confiscated by the FBI, that are supposedly in a secure place. We are told the old line "nothing to see here" How about letting us be the judge of that?

How come we cannot see the "note" or "manifesto" from the alleged LAX shooter?

How come we cannot see the video of the alleged LAX shooter? I seem to recall airports being loaded with security cameras.

How come we cannot hear the 9/11 tapes from Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting?  

How come we cannot see the video of the Boston Marathon bombing, we hear that there is video of the brothers leaving backpacks in the garbage cans, where is it?

How come we cannot see the Tsarnov kid in the courtroom.  This is not 1800, we have very silent cameras now, artist rendering of courtroom participants is quite outdated in todays society.

How come there is no camera in the Supreme Court.  It does seem that most of the recent decision are in favor of big pharma, banking, big business, and the like. The slaves of Gitmo would like a look into the halls of the elites.

HOW COME OUR MAINSTREAM NEWS MEDIA IS NOT HOUNDING THE POWERS THAT BE FOR THIS INFORMATION?  YOU ARE OUR VOICE! REMEMBER, THE FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT! HOW ABOUT DOING YOUR FUCKING JOBS, INSTEAD OF BEING SELLOUTS TO BIG BUSINESS, BIG PHARMA, BIG BANKSTERS,BIG BLOWHARDS IN GOVERNMENT.

But, you people in news give us instead, a list of things that have been in or out of various hollywoood starlets vaginas, who is screwing who, who is divorcing who, honey frikin boo boo, kardashians up the ass, why tom cruise is unhappy this morning, what channing tatum ate for lunch or who he ate, whatever, you get the point. and you do it so well, that some or it seems like most people care about this useless garbage.   You have turned us into slaves to celebrity news. STOP IT. You are supposed to do a public service.

Gitmo Gil

p.s. sorry for the swear words kids... 

Thanks to No Agenda for revving me up tonight.

One Conspiracy to Rule Them All....

To listen to the mainstream media and swallow the garbage they are able to pump out at astounding levels, you would think that two people NEVER GOT TOGETHER TO COMMIT A CRIME.  The very word "conspiracy" is now such a derisive term, I think we should look for a new definition.  Those in the seats of power in the government and media want us to believe that every felony, is of the "lone wolf" variety.  I personally take offense to that.  I will grant that there are some crimes like that, but a scant few. Conspiracies do exist. Lets start with the one that was in the forefront of the news when I was a child, and coming into my formative years.

WATERGATE- There was a break in at the Watergate Hotel that was a CONSPIRACY. Many people were involved in the planning and carrying out the crime.  How come the word CONSPIRACY is NEVER INCLUDED in the headlines or any stories about Watergate?  Because, the mainstream media does not want that "C" word associated with a real proven crime, that's why...

You have Erlichmann, Halderman, Hunt, Liddy, and of course, Nixon.  What has gone largely unnoticed over the years is the "why" to the crime.  We were fed the line about Nixon wanting to know the democratic strategy to the upcoming elections.  I personally think that is a bunch of crap.  There is talk that the democrats had uncovered some very interesting information about one of the "3 hobo's" that were rounded up behind the picket fence on November 22, 1963.  One of the men in that photo was none other than E. Howard Hunt.  A long time employee of the Central Intelligence Agency, and an aide of Tricky Dick Nixon himself.  Fast forward some years, and E. Howard Hunt, on his deathbed, confessed to pulling one of the triggers on that fateful day in Dallas.  The 50 year anniversary of JFK's MURDER is approaching.  There are still thousands of files on the investigation that has never been released for us mere slaves of Gitmo Nation to read. Why do think that is?  

How many Presidents were in Dallas that day?  How many Presidents went out of their way to make a phone call to give themselves an alibi for that day?  How many Presidents were working for the Central Intelligence Agency at the time of the assassination?  These are some very interesting questions.  There is a photo, a very curious photo that was taken the seconds before JFK was shot, and in that photo, Lee Harvey Oswald is standing outside the front door of the Texas School Book Depository. Please look very closely, and you will see him clearly in the picture.  The question I have to ask, why was this photo not included in the Warren Commission Report?

Now I have a question that was put to me by my brother, Gitmo Glen a couple years back.  How is it possible that the new CIA building in Virginia came to be named after George H. W. Bush?   According to his bio, he only worked for the "agency" for a year and a half, then why the fancy moniker?  I would deduce that Poppy was very instrumental in the killing of JFK.  He was there, no question about that.

Poppy Bush-Dallas November 22, 1963

He went to make a phone call, to place himself "not in" Dallas that day, but clearly this photo taken in front of the Texas School Book Depository on November 22, 1963, places him squarely in the middle of the mayhem.  Then there is the amazing coincidence that 2 of the "hobo's" from Dealy Plaza are the 2 of the same Watergate burglars.  You cannot make this shit up.  When confronted with this information, we are just supposed to ignore it. 

Frank Sturgis, and E. Howard Hunt, Dallas, November 22, 1963

The bigger the lie, those more people will believe it.  You have Poppy Bush, working for the CIA, and Hunt and Sturgis, working for the CIA, two of them disguised at hobos, and this is all in our imagination?  Wake the hell up.

Here is another coincidence we are supposed to ignore, Poppy's father Prescott Bush (who financed Adolph Hitler's rise to power) also groomed Richard Nixon, and Jack Ruby.  But, nothing to see here...

Nixon, Ruby, Bush

I have said it before, and I will say it again, the Bush family has done more to destroy this country than any other family.  Can you think of a worse one?  I honestly believe they are the personification of evil.  The sheer scope of their lust for power and wealth, is beyond what  many can think of.  Prescott Bush saw a way to make money with Adolph Hitler.  Think about that one for a while.  Prescott Bush employed and groomed Richard Nixon and Jack Ruby.  The sheer odds of those people, in that time, connecting and carrying out their plans defies the odds, yet we are supposed to ignore those connections.  

Any good detective, worth their salt always looks for "connections" between the suspects and victims of crimes.  Jack Ruby was granted access to the Dallas Police underground parking lot, with a gun.  How did those strings get pulled?  There are so many unanswered questions about JFK, and September 11, 2001, and we slaves of Gitmo Nation are supposed to shut up and take it.  I am sick of taking it, its time we turned the table on pure evil.  Until we do, we will never get our country back.

Want another very under reported news story?  If I wrote the following story for a movie producer, they would toss me out on my ass.  Lets say that there is a presidential shooting assassination attempt.  

Lets say that the family of the shooter and the man who would take office if the President died were very close over the years.

Lets say the vice presidents son was going to have dinner with the father of the shooter the very next day.

That would be crazy right?

IT HAPPENED, AND HARDLY ANYONE KNOWS ABOUT IT.

Please look it up.  John Hinckley's family and Bush family were close friends for years, and tried to kill Reagan, and who would have been President, yep, that evil name again, Bush.

I will say it again, I cannot make this shit up.  

What I find most curious about the whole Watergate CONSPIRACY is why the FBI chose to give this information to Woodward and Bernstein to publish in the paper, instead of investigating the CONSPIRACY themselves?  W. Mark Felt, a former FBI Special Agent came out of the closet a few years ago, prior to his death, and the infamous "Deep Throat"..  This just opens up a shitload more questions about the FBI and their agenda.

I could go on and on, but I must stop now.  Please do yourself a favor and investigate, really look into the past, it is a great predictor of the future.  

The biggest CONSPIRACY by definition, is of course September 11, 2001.  I will only parrot what the mainstream media and the "official" story.  If 19 people get together and plan a crime, that is a conspiracy.  How come the mainstream media NEVER includes that word, when referencing that crime?  It just makes me wonder just how powerful the forces are at the top of the food chain.  

Gitmo Gil

Cutting the Cord? Try it, you might like it...

I have not been a cable TV subscriber for almost 5 years now. I will say with 99% surety that I will never be a cable television subscriber again. It is a personal choice, it is not for everyone. If you upset with paying anywhere from $75-$150 a month for the privilege of cable, then cutting the cord might be for you. There are so many options nowadays for alternate television viewing, you would be doing a disservice if you at least did not look into it.  I am going to place a link here that will give you a starter guide to cord cutting, and all the options.

I personally use a combination of a Roku device, a laptop with an HDMI port, and thats it. No remote to rent monthly, no cable box to rent monthly.  
 The Roku box is the coolest thing ever... ok, I might be exaggerating a bit, but it is pretty darn sweet.  I get many channels, Netflix, Popcorn, Pandora, The BBC, and others. I get my favorite pod casts, both video and audio, radio stations, all through this box, about the size of a hockey puck. And yes, for full disclosure, you can buy a roku through my site on the link at left. I will add, I will never try to sell anything on my blog here, that I do not believe in. That includes books, movies, any electronics. Believe me, I dont make a lot if you get something through my site to Amazon. Just a few sheckles.

My monthly cost for all my entertainment is $31.87 give or take a penny.  $21 for Internet, $8 for Netflix and about $1.87 for an Amazon Prime account I split with my son.  Believe me, I am never at a loss for entertainment. The only thing I sort of miss a little, is football on Sunday.  Even for that there is a free channel too.  

I have been at many friends houses and either my friend or their kids will go through all the channels and say "there's nothing on". And they are only paying $180 month for the "Triple Play", and they don't even use the phone line, except to get telemarketing calls.  Their Internet connection is the one they use, and the cable is so loaded with crap nowadays, they are literally throwing $120 a month out the window.  Now I will not say that cable does not have some good things, they do, football. 

There are literally thousands of channels on Roku you can subscribe to, and the list is very comprehensive.  If you have followed my blog at all, you know that I am not a fan of the American mainstream media, they have sold out, its that simple. The main thrust of the news networks is to entertain the people. Once the news divisions of the networks had to make money, they sold out.  How can a network do any "hard" news on Monsanto for instance, when Monsanto pays the bill for advertising?  Don't believe me, try watching Foxnews, or MSNBC, or if you want to laugh real hard, CNN. New has become infotainment.  It is a joke, I don't care one bit about the Kardashian's or who slept with who.  Now granted, the BBC and Russia Today are not 100% news either, but it is better than the American crap. I usually get my news from the internet.

I have lists of roku channels to check out, and the user groups always have great suggestions for channels.  Like I said, It is not for everyone. If you enjoy the endless parade of commercials you see on television, then the Roku is not for you.  I am guilty of finding a little gem of a show in Netflix, and watching every episode, right in a row, with no commercials, ITS AWESOME.  The other night I watched the last episode of Breaking Bad on AMC in its scheduled time, that was the first time I ever did that. I do not miss commercials one bit.

But I must admit, having a laptop with an HDMI port is almost as nice.  If you did not know it, there are thousands of full length movies on Youtube, yep, thousands. I am a documentary freak, and Youtube and Vimeo are so great at having those at your fingertips. Just plug in the HDMI cable, and your laptop is another television.

  I laughed like hell the other day, I was at a friends home, and there was a commercial for some cable network and their box had the capability to record "5 channels at a time". Can anyone tell me, at anytime, are there 5 good shows on at the same time? Really.. Do we as people need this? I guess so. Not me. 

I give the Roku a big thumbs up. It might not be for you as an alternative, but as an add on, you would never be at a loss to find any kind of programming. Whether its Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, or the hundreds of other channels, you should at least check it out. Let me know your experience with a Roku. I will post your comments.

Gitmo Gil.

They can put a man on the moon, but....

Is this content? Is this advertising?  These days that line has been crossed, and it is meant to confuse us.  There use to be break from a television program or news channel which would denote the time for a commercial.  The television networks are very aware of "time shifting" and "on demand" viewing.  To combat that growing trend, the advertisers have been, and are doing more and more, in programming advertising. Here is one I came across this morning.  You tell me, is this news, or advertising? 

CNN has been on the decline for years, and this is just one more example of why that downward trend is continuing.  This is not to say that the other news networks are doing the same, but this is so in your face, it is disgusting.  I made the choice 6 years ago to cut the cord.  I refuse to pay the cable companies for the hundred channels I do not want, just for the privilege of watching the handful I like.  I chose instead to use the Roku box, and have never looked back. I watch what I want, when I want, with NO COMMERCIALS. I have been over at the homes of some friends and they will channel surf, and invariably I will hear this "there's nothing on".  How insane is that?  They are paying anywhere form $80 to $150 a month for this.  

Kevin Spacey nailed it.  The old model for the cable companies is ebbing away.  I am reminded of the famous line on Seinfeld by George Costanza, " they can put a man on the moon".  I have been saying this for years about the cable tv industry.  There is no reason that a subscriber should not pay for JUST the channels they want.

I challenge you dear reader, take the plunge, cut the cord!!!

Beware...

At first there will some minor withdrawal, there will some silence in your home, because instead of having that background noise you are use to, you will forced to talk to your spouse, talk to your kids, read a book, and lets not forget,you will not have to listen to those inane commercials.

 If you choose a Roku, you will be talking about it to your friends, and your enemies. Every one of them will probably ask the same question. What the hell is a Roku?  Your face will light up, you will tell them, and there will be that hint, that subtle hint from them that they are missing out on something cool.  When you tell them that they will save over $1000 a year, that is the jaw dropping moment.

I have personally "converted" about 10 people to the Roku. Not one of them has regretted it. Just sayin....

From Gitmo Nation,

Gitmo Gil